Sunday 5 December 2010

Price Comparison to that of CCD

It takes about 5 seconds to scan the whole spine, whereas it usually takes 3 seconds to examine the chest only. In order to scan the longer part such as whole spine or lower extremities, the capacity of X-ray tube should be larger than that of CCD. Our system as cooling type has 1MHU, whereas CCD type uses 1/3 ~ 2/5 of the amount DDR Inventor-V has. We think that's why our price seems to be higher than CCD DR systems.

It may sound far-fetched, but MIC detector is semi-permanent provided that it is used properly without being affected by outer physical impact. If such as impact was made, the gas in the detector could be leaking and the detector could function less effectively. Then we have to repair it, refilling the gas.

And replacing the detector costs reasonably provided that it is caused by user's carelessness in their usage and the warranty period is over. In fact, we will offer the replacement at the reasonable price until the system is no longer used.

We are certain that even though it may cost more than CCD DR as initial investment, DDR Inventor-V will be economically advantageous in the longer term compared to CCD or FPD types.

No comments:

Post a Comment